ATM Fees: Does Bank Size Matter?
نویسنده
چکیده
and Richard Kopcke provided helpful comments. The data used in the study were made available by Bank Rate Monitor. Joshua Congdon-Martin and Marie Willard supplied excellent research assistance. The debate on automated teller machine (ATM) fees heated up recently, when voters in San Francisco and Santa Monica approved bans on banks' charging non-customers for using their ATMs. A federal court ruling has temporarily barred the two California cities from enforcing the bans, however. Connecticut and Iowa used existing laws to ban such ATM fees, but the Connecticut Supreme Court rejected the ban in that state. The Pentagon has said it would consider a ban on ATM fees on U.S. military bases. So far, the Congress has rejected legislation that would eliminate non-customer ATM fees nationwide. ATM networks have allowed banks to charge non-customers for withdrawing money from their ATMs since 1996, but ATM fees have been criticized repeatedly by consumer advocates and politicians and the California bans may soon be copied in New York and elsewhere. Large banks 1 have been especially targeted, because they are more likely to impose the fees and their fees tend to be higher than those charged by small institutions. Critics of ATM fees call large banks greedy. Supporters argue that the fees represent the cost of convenience, and that consumers are willing to pay for being able to withdraw money anywhere, and not just at their own institutions. Large banks' ATMs are more convenient, because they allow access to cash at more locations. Surveys comparing ATM fees across financial institutions have shown that large banks' fees exceed those charged by small banks (most surveys do not control for differences in quality among banks of various sizes. ATM fees are prices charged for a service—typically a cash withdrawal. The more machines a bank has, the more convenient it is for cardholders to withdraw cash. This article analyzes differences in ATM fees among banks in order to test whether large banks impose higher ATM fees than do small banks, controlling for some quality and cost differences associated with more ATMs.
منابع مشابه
Koskosas I. THE PROS AND CONS OF INTERNET BANKING: A SHORT REVIEW
Bank fees often strike fear in the heart of the average banking customer. According to a survey by Bank-rate, a company that reports on banks and banking, customers continue to get smashed with higher fees, ranging from ATM charges to minimum-balance fees. In addition, some customers are even charged a commission fee just to speak to a real live bank teller! In a recent checking account pricing...
متن کاملATM Surcharges: Effects on Deployment and Welfare∗
This paper analyzes the effects of ATM surcharges on deployment and welfare, in a model where banks compete for ATM and banking services. Foreign fees, surcharges and the interchange fee are endogenously determined. We find situations in which surcharges are welfare enhancing. Under strategic fee setting, the increase in deployment caused by surcharging might compensate the surplus loss caused ...
متن کاملIncompatibility and Consumer Demand: Evidence from ATMs
Incompatibility between complementary components of system goods can have substantial effects on consumer welfare. In this paper, we estimate the effects of incompatibility in a classic “hardware/software” market: ATM cards and machines. Our empirical model allows us to measure the “indirect network effect” that a bank’s ATM deployment has on willingness to pay for competitors’ deposit accounts...
متن کاملInterchange Fees and Ine¢ ciencies in the Substitution between Payment Cards and Cash
This article explains why the collective determination of interchange fees in payment platforms and in ATM networks can lead to ine¢ ciencies in the substitution between payment cards and cash. If the issuers are ATM owners, I show that the pro t maximising interchange fees reect the trade-o¤ that banks make between the pro ts on foreign withdrawals and the possibility to save the costs of cas...
متن کاملIncompatibility, Product Attributes and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from ATMs, NET Institute Working Paper #04-06, www.NETinst.org
Incompatibility in markets with network effects can either benefit or harm consumers. Incompatibility reduces consumers’ ability to “mix and match” components offered by different sellers, but can also be associated with changes in product attributes that might benefit consumers. In this paper, we estimate the effects of incompatibility in a classic hardware/software market: ATM cards and machi...
متن کامل